Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 120W)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1680MHz vs 1650MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
8960 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2534
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
+1190%
32690
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Mar 2023
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
76
768
Shading Units
9728
48
TMUs
304
24
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
39.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
79.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
5.069 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
120W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
AD103
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
45.9 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
