Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs Quadro K5000 SYNC
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (15W vs 122W)
Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 68.29GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
1280
Quadro K5000 SYNC
+69%
2169
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2013
Tegra
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1067 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.29GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
1536
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
32
Tensor Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
2.560 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1280 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
640.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
122W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
-
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA10B
GPU Name
GK104
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3.54 billion
Unknown
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
