Mobility Radeon X2300 HD vs FirePro W4190M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Mobility Radeon X2300 HD and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro W4190M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock900MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 3.024GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Nov 2015
M7x
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
900 MHz
378 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
32bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3.024GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
-
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
1.916 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
1.916 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
Unknown
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
M71
GPU Name
Opal
M71-S
GPU Variant
-
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
3.0
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
