Home Comparison Opteron 8218 (F3) vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654

Opteron 8218 (F3) vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654

We compared two server CPUs: Opteron 8218 (F3) with 2 cores 2.6GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 with 96 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Opteron 8218 (F3) 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.6GHz vs 2.4GHz)
Lower TDP (95W vs 360W)
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 7 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 667)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 1)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 90nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Aug 2006
Release Date
Mar 2023
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Santa Rosa
Core Architecture
Genoa
AMD Socket F
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Opteron (Santa Rosa)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

0.227 billions
Transistor Count
78.84 billions
90 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
95 W
Power Consumption
360 W
-
Foundry
TSMC
235 mm²
Die Size
12x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

2.6 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
2
Total Core Count
96
2
Total Thread Count
192
200 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
13.0
Multiplier
24.0
128 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
384 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
8
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR2-667
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

1
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy