Quadro 6000 SDI vs Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro 6000 SDI and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 6000 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (231W vs 2400W)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 143.4GB/s)
15936 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 6000 SDI
1028
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+5000%
52430
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
747 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
16384
56
TMUs
1024
48
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
231W
TDP
2400W
550 W
Suggested PSU
2800 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
2x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
100 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
