Quadro 6000 SDI vs Quadro M3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro 6000 SDI and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 6000 SDI 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 143.4GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 231W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 6000 SDI
1028
Quadro M3000M
+109%
2150
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
747 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
231W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
2x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
N16E-Q1-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
