Quadro FX 1700 vs Quadro P2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 75W)
Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1120 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
59
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+4940%
2974
Graphics Card
Sep 2007
Release Date
Feb 2019
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1291 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
9
32
Shading Units
1152
16
TMUs
72
8
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GP106
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
