Quadro FX 1700 vs RTX A2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 95W)
RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1687MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2528 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
59
RTX A2000 Mobile
+14538%
8637
Graphics Card
Sep 2007
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1215 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1687 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
20
32
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.98 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.637 TFLOPS
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.637 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
135.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
95W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GA107
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
