Quadro FX 1700 vs Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 250W)
Tesla C2090 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
59
Tesla C2090
+2157%
1332
Graphics Card
Sep 2007
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
16
32
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
48
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GF110
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
3 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1