Quadro FX 1700 vs Quadro M2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 75W)
Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
736 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
59
Quadro M2000
+2927%
1786
Graphics Card
Sep 2007
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
796 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GM206
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
