Quadro FX 360M vs AMD Instinct MI300A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M and 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 760W)
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
14576 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 360M
26
AMD Instinct MI300A
+471438%
122600
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
128GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM3
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
228
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
14592
8
TMUs
880
4
ROPs
0
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
980.6 TFLOPS
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
122.6 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
61.3 TFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
760W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
MI300
NB8M-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
146 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
