Quadro FX 360M vs Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 250W)
Tesla C2090 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 360M
26
Tesla C2090
+5023%
1332
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
16
16
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
48
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
GF110
NB8M-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
3 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
