Home Comparison Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Data Center GPU Max 1100

Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Data Center GPU Max 1100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
6976 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
462
Data Center GPU Max 1100 +4709%
22220

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro FX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
7168
64
TMUs
448
24
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
192 KB
L2 Cache
204 MB

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
694.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.22 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.22 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.22 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
55 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
100 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net