Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Quadro M520 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Quadro M520 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
Quadro M520 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1536GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
462
Quadro M520 Mobile
+73%
800
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2017
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
40.10GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
8
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.328 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.66 GTexel/s
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
799.5 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.98 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GM108
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
Unknown
470 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
