Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
462
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
+1046%
5299
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
945 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
30
192
Shading Units
1920
64
TMUs
120
24
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.60 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
165.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
80W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
N19E-Q1-KA-K1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
