Quadro FX 580 vs A10M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 580 and 24GB VRAM A10M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 580 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)
A10M 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1635MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
7136 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 580
72
A10M
+32455%
23440
Graphics Card
Apr 2009
Release Date
Feb 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1635 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
56
32
Shading Units
7168
16
TMUs
224
8
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.8 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
366.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.44 TFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.44 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
732.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
G96C
GPU Name
GA102
G96-875-C1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
