Home Comparison Quadro FX 580 vs Data Center GPU Flex 140

Quadro FX 580 vs Data Center GPU Flex 140

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 580 and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro FX 580 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 580
72
Data Center GPU Flex 140 +5447%
3994

Graphics Card

Apr 2009
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
RT Cores
8
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G96C
GPU Name
DG2-128
G96-875-C1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net