Quadro FX 580 vs Radeon Instinct MI300
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 580 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 580 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 600W)
Radeon Instinct MI300 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
14048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 580
72
Radeon Instinct MI300
+66386%
47870
Graphics Card
Apr 2009
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro FX
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
220
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
14080
16
TMUs
880
8
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
880
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
600W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G96C
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
G96-875-C1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
153 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A