Quadro FX 580 vs Tesla S1075
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 580 and 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 580 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Lower TDP (40W vs 800W)
Tesla S1075 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
208 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 580
72
Tesla S1075
+763%
622
Graphics Card
Apr 2009
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
30
32
Shading Units
240
16
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
72.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
800W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
G96C
GPU Name
GT200B
G96-875-C1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
