Quadro K200M vs Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
326
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+5050%
16790
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
192
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
128
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
35W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
DG2-512
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
