Quadro K200M vs Data Center GPU Max 1100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 300W)
Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
6976 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
326
Data Center GPU Max 1100
+6715%
22220
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
192
Shading Units
7168
16
TMUs
448
8
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
204 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
694.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.22 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.22 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.22 TFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
100 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
