Quadro K2200 vs GRID RTX T10 2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 2GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2200 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (68W vs 150W)
GRID RTX T10 2 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (1395MHz vs 1124MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1439
GRID RTX T10 2
+594%
9999
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2020
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1046 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
56
640
Shading Units
3584
40
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
68W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
