Quadro K2200 vs Quadro FX 3600M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (68W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
+799%
1439
Quadro FX 3600M
160
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Feb 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
1046 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
8
640
Shading Units
64
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
68W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
NB8E-GLM3
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
