Home Comparison Quadro K2200 vs L4

Quadro K2200 vs L4

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 24GB VRAM L4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (68W vs 72W)
L4 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 81% (2040MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (300.1GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
6784 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1439
L4 +2004%
30290

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro
Generation
Tesla Ada(Lxx)
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
795 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
300.1GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
60
640
Shading Units
7424
40
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
60
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
163.2 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
30.29 TFLOPS
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
30.29 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
473.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

68W
TDP
72W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
AD104
-
GPU Variant
AD104-???-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net