Home Comparison Quadro K2200 vs Quadro K5000 SYNC

Quadro K2200 vs Quadro K5000 SYNC

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (68W vs 122W)
Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1439
Quadro K5000 SYNC +50%
2169

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

640
Shading Units
1536
40
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS

Board Design

68W
TDP
122W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK104
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net