Quadro K2200 vs Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 46% (1124MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (68W vs 150W)
Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1439
Quadro K5200
+146%
3553
Blender
Quadro K2200
127
Quadro K5200
+130%
293
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1046 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
640
Shading Units
2304
40
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
48
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
68W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GK110B
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
