Quadro K2200 vs Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (68W vs 80W)
Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1350MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1439
Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q
+476%
8294
Blender
Quadro K2200
127
Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q
+1068%
1484
OctaneBench
Quadro K2200
34
Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q
+244%
117
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1046 MHz
Base Clock
600 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
48
640
Shading Units
3072
40
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
259.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
16.59 TFLOPS
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.294 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
259.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
68W
TDP
80W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
TU104
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
