Quadro K2200 vs Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (1455MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
3968 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1439
Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
+831%
13410
Blender
Quadro K2200
127
Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
+2212%
2937
OctaneBench
Quadro K2200
34
Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
+944%
355
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Sep 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Turing-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1046 MHz
Base Clock
1275 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
72
640
Shading Units
4608
40
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.7 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
419.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.82 TFLOPS
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.41 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
419.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
68W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
TU102
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
