Home Comparison Quadro K2200 vs RTX A1000 Embedded

Quadro K2200 vs RTX A1000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 45% (1627MHz vs 1124MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 68W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1439
RTX A1000 Embedded +363%
6664
Blender
Quadro K2200
127
RTX A1000 Embedded +921%
1297

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
1192 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
640
Shading Units
2048
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.10 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.664 TFLOPS
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.664 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
104.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

68W
TDP
60W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GA107S
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
Unknown
148 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net