Quadro K2200 vs Tesla K20c
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (68W vs 225W)
Tesla K20c 's Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1439
Tesla K20c
+144%
3524
OctaneBench
Quadro K2200
34
Tesla K20c
+61%
55
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1046 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s
Render Config
640
Shading Units
2496
40
TMUs
208
16
ROPs
40
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS
Board Design
68W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GK110
-
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
