Quadro K5000 SYNC vs A10M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC and 24GB VRAM A10M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (122W vs 150W)
A10M 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1635MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2169
A10M
+980%
23440
Graphics Card
Jan 2013
Release Date
Feb 2022
Quadro
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1635 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
56
1536
Shading Units
7168
128
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.8 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
366.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.44 TFLOPS
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.44 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
732.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
122W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GA102
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
