Quadro K5000 SYNC vs GRID M60 4A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC and 4GB VRAM GRID M60 4A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
Lower TDP (122W vs 225W)
GRID M60 4A 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1178MHz
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2169
GRID M60 4A
+122%
4825
Graphics Card
Jan 2013
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
1536
Shading Units
2048
128
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.39 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.8 GTexel/s
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.825 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
150.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
122W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GM204
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
