Quadro K5000 SYNC vs RTX A1000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1627MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 122W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2169
RTX A1000 Embedded
+207%
6664
Graphics Card
Jan 2013
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1192 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
16
1536
Shading Units
2048
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.10 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.664 TFLOPS
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.664 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
104.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
122W
TDP
60W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GA107S
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
Unknown
294 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
