Quadro K500M vs GRID A100A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K500M and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 400W)
GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
6720 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K500M
326
GRID A100A
+4160%
13890
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
108
192
Shading Units
6912
16
TMUs
432
8
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
400W
-
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GA100
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
