Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs L40S

Quadro M2000 vs L40S

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 48GB VRAM L40S to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
L40S 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 117% (2520MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
17408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
L40S +5029%
91610
Blender
Quadro M2000
145
L40S +6271%
9239
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Oct 2022
Quadro
Generation
Tesla Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
1110 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
142
768
Shading Units
18176
48
TMUs
568
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
483.8 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1431 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.61 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.61 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1431 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
AD102
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
AD102-???-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy