Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Quadro M2000 vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 110W)
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 52% (1770MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile +508%
10870
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
1365 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
48
768
Shading Units
3072
48
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
113.3 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
339.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.75 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.87 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
339.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
110W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
TU104
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
N19E-Q5-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy