Quadro M2000 vs Tesla K20c
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
Tesla K20c 's Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
Tesla K20c
+97%
3524
OctaneBench
Quadro M2000
28
Tesla K20c
+96%
55
Graphics Card
Apr 2016
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s
Render Config
768
Shading Units
2496
48
TMUs
208
32
ROPs
40
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
Theoretical Performance
37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
GK110
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
