Quadro M2000M vs Quadro T2000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 48% (1620MHz vs 1098MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 55W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1405
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+136%
3318
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M2000M
1180
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+172%
3220
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M2000M
552
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+172%
1505
Blender
Quadro M2000M
132
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+250%
463
OctaneBench
Quadro M2000M
34
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+108%
71
Graphics Card
Dec 2015
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1029 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
16
640
Shading Units
1024
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
40W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
TU117
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
