Quadro NVS 290 vs Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 50W)
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
29
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+10096%
2957
Graphics Card
Oct 2007
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
14
16
Shading Units
896
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.914 TFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.957 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
92.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
21W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
TU117B
-
GPU Variant
N19P-Q1-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
