Quadro P2000 Mobile vs Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 2400W)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (1600MHz vs 1291MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
15232 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2974
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+1662%
52430
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s
Render Config
9
SM Count
-
1152
Shading Units
16384
72
TMUs
1024
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
2400W
-
Suggested PSU
2800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
16 nm
Process Size
10 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
100 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
