Quadro P2000 Mobile vs Quadro T2000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores
Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (1620MHz vs 1291MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2974
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+11%
3318
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2096
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+53%
3220
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+14%
1723
Quadro T2000 Max Q
1505
Blender
Quadro P2000 Mobile
231
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+100%
463
OctaneBench
Quadro P2000 Mobile
54
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+31%
71
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s
Render Config
9
SM Count
16
1152
Shading Units
1024
72
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
40W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
TU117
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
