Quadro P5200 Max Q vs Quadro 2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1569MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+1573%
8033
Quadro 2000D
480
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Oct 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1316 MHz
Base Clock
-
1569 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
4
2560
Shading Units
192
160
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
100.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
251.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
125.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.033 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
251.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
62W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
