Home Comparison Quadro P5200 Max Q vs Quadro FX 380

Quadro P5200 Max Q vs Quadro FX 380

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1569MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Max Q +22851%
8033
Quadro FX 380
35

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1316 MHz
Base Clock
-
1569 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

20
SM Count
2
2560
Shading Units
16
160
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
8
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

100.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
251.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.600 GTexel/s
125.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.033 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
251.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
34W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
G96
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
16 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net