Quadro P5200 Max Q vs Quadro FX 3800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1569MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 108W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+1638%
8033
Quadro FX 3800
462
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1316 MHz
Base Clock
-
1569 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
24
2560
Shading Units
192
160
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
100.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
251.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
125.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.033 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
251.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
108W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-835-B2
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
