Quadro P600 Mobile vs Tesla C2075
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P600 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P600 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 247W)
Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P600 Mobile
+21%
1244
Tesla C2075
1028
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Pascal-M
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1430 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s
Render Config
3
SM Count
14
384
Shading Units
448
24
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
48
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
25.92 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
38.88 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
19.44 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1244 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
38.88 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
247W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
3 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
