Quadro P600 vs Quadro FX 4600 SDI
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P600 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1557MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 768GB)
288 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 154W)
Quadro FX 4600 SDI 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (67.20GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P600
+420%
1196
Quadro FX 4600 SDI
230
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1329 MHz
Base Clock
-
1557 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
67.20GB/s
Render Config
3
SM Count
12
384
Shading Units
96
24
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
24
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
96 KB
Theoretical Performance
24.91 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
37.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
18.68 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1196 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
230.4 GFLOPS
37.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
40W
TDP
154W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
G80
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
90 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.0
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
