Quadro P600 vs Quadro T2000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1620MHz vs 1557MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P600
1196
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+177%
3318
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P600
1105
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+191%
3220
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P600
374
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+302%
1505
Blender
Quadro P600
122
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+279%
463
OctaneBench
Quadro P600
23
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+208%
71
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1329 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
1557 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s
Render Config
3
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
24.91 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
37.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
18.68 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
1196 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
37.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
40W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
TU117
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
