Home Comparison Quadro P600 vs Quadro P2000 Mobile

Quadro P600 vs Quadro P2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 and 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro P600 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (1557MHz vs 1291MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P600
1196
Quadro P2000 Mobile +148%
2974
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P600
1105
Quadro P2000 Mobile +89%
2096
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P600
374
Quadro P2000 Mobile +360%
1723
Blender
Quadro P600
122
Quadro P2000 Mobile +89%
231
OctaneBench
Quadro P600
23
Quadro P2000 Mobile +134%
54

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Feb 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1329 MHz
Base Clock
1291 MHz
1557 MHz
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
9
384
Shading Units
1152
24
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
32
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB

Theoretical Performance

24.91 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
37.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
18.68 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
1196 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
37.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GP106
Pascal
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net