Quadro RTX 8000 vs Quadro T1000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro RTX 8000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1770MHz vs 1455MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
Quadro T1000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 260W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000
+525%
16310
Quadro T1000 Mobile
2607
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro RTX 8000
+363%
13586
Quadro T1000 Mobile
2934
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro RTX 8000
+377%
6871
Quadro T1000 Mobile
1439
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
1395 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s
Render Config
72
SM Count
14
4608
Shading Units
896
288
TMUs
56
96
ROPs
32
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.56 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
81.48 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.215 TFLOPS
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.607 TFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.48 GFLOPS
Board Design
260W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
TU117
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
