Quadro RTX 8000 vs RTX A5500 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 and 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro RTX 8000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (1770MHz vs 1500MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
RTX A5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
2816 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 260W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000
16310
RTX A5500 Mobile
+36%
22270
Blender
Quadro RTX 8000
2844
RTX A5500 Mobile
+17%
3342
OctaneBench
Quadro RTX 8000
337
RTX A5500 Mobile
+15%
389
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
975 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
72
SM Count
58
4608
Shading Units
7424
288
TMUs
232
96
ROPs
96
576
Tensor Cores
232
72
RT Cores
58
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
348.0 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.27 TFLOPS
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.27 TFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
348.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
260W
TDP
165W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GA103
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
22 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
